IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.362 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2603 of 2017 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Prasad Yadav @ Raj Kumar Prasad S/o Ramotar Prasad, @ Ram Autar Yadav, R/o Village Kabilpur, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Sri Amir Subhani the State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Dr. Tyagrajan S.M. the District Magistrate, Gaya. 3. Mr. Suraj Kumar, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gaya Sadar, Gaya. 4. Mr. Sunil Kumar Sah, the Circle Officer, Fatehpur, District- Gaya. 5. Jehal Yadav S/o Late Rupan Yadav, R/o Village- Kabilpur, P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. 6. Vikas Yadav S/o Jehal Yadav, R/o Village- Kabilpur, P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. 7. Bhola Yadav S/o Baijnath Yadav, R/o Village- Kabilpur, P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. 8. Shree Bhagwan Yadav S/o Baijnath Yadav, R/o Village- Kabilpur, P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. 9. Ram Autar Yadav S/o Late Dhanni Yadav, R/o Village- Kabilpur, P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. 10. Naresh Yadav S/o Ram Autar Yadav @ Ramotar Prasad, R/o Village- Kabilpur, P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. 11. Ram Khelawan Yadav S/o Late Rupan Yadav, R/o Village- Kabilpur, P.O. and P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag 12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 5 19-09-2025 The learned counsel for the opposite parties submits by referring to paragraph no.9 of the supplementary show-cause filed in the present case that in compliance of the order of this Patna High Court MJC No.362 of 2023(5) dt.19-09-2025 2/2 Court dated 04.08.2022, passed in CWJC No.2603 of 2017, substantial encroachment has already been removed. 2. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though it is true that substantial portion of the encroachment made over government land has stood removed, however the encroachment made by the opposite party no.7 over the government land is yet to be removed, hence the petitioner be granted liberty to take recourse to the due process of law for removal of the encroachment made by the opposite party no.7 over the government land. Liberty so sought is granted. 3. The petition stands disposed off. kanchan/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U