SMT. SANGITA RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS ANUBHAG LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/12477/2025 · 2025-10-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189815 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189815 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12477 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Mr. N.C. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4 and perused the material on record.
Instant petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"(i) Issue a writ in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of the entire service benefits le payment of fixation of pension gratuity leave encashment and other service benefits amount to the petitioner as early as possible without any further delay without making any deduction. (ii) To issue a writ order or directions in the nature of the Mandamus commanding the opp.party no.2 to 4 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner as contained in annexure no 5 and 6 to this writ petition." Notice to the respondent nos. 5 and 6 is dispensed with as the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage itself.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be subserved if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation and direct the respondent no.2 to consider and decide the same within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Pushkar, Karunesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Naveen Chandra Upadhyay Smt. Sangita Rawat .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Nagar Vikas Anubhag Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submission aforesaid.
Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.2/Nagar Ayukta, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.2 is directed to consider and decide the said representation, in accordance with law, within a period of two month from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12477 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench