ANANT KUMAR DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8957/2025 · 2025-10-17
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189799 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189799 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8957 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the order dated 02.11.2021 passed in Criminal Complaint Case No. 397/2016 (Smt. Kumari Versus Anant Kumar Dixit), under Sections 406/420/468/470/471 IPC, Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Lucknow and permit the applicant to appear before the court below and file fresh bail bond and personal bond.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant could not appear before the court below on 23.11.2021 and he has submitted that his one partner Shri Durgesh Kumar Mihsra, who is no more, was looking after the affairs of the business and he was also doing pairvi of criminal trial. Therefore he could not appear before the court below, i.e. why non-bailable warrant has been issued.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has given undertaking that the applicant will cooperate before the trial court and will not seek adjournment.
5. In view of the aforesaid, I stay the operation of the order dated Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vashu Deo Mishra, S.K. Mishra Nagraha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anant Kumar Dixit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
02.11.2021, passed in Criminal Complaint Case No. 397/2016 (Smt. Neelu Kumari Vs. Anant Kumar Dixit), under Sections 406/420/468/470/471 IPC, Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Lucknow, for the period of six weeks. The applicant will move an application for recall of the non-bailable warrant within 10 days, which will be decided within the aforesaid period. The applicant will not seek adjournment. In case he seeks adjournment in future, the benefit granted by this Court, will not be available to the applicant and the trial court will proceed against the applicant, in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Muk A482 No. 8957 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench