APHC010263562013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 14781/2013 Between: 1. V.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, MANAGING PARTNER M/S SRI BASLAJI RICE MILL, LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, ( I/C KAKUMANU, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE TAHSILDAR KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned order in E.C.Act Case No. 90/2013-57 and the show cause notice No.90/2013-57 simultaneously dt. 10-4-2013 directing the 2nd respondent herein for disposal of the seized stocks by conducting open auction without affording reasonable opportunity to the petitioner to submit his explanation, as being illegal, 2 VS,J W.P.No.14781 of 2013 arbitrary, unilateral and consequently set aside the same, by directing the respondent No.1 to expedite the enquiry U/Sec. 6-A of the E.C. Act and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 17953 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of auction of the seized stocks pursuant to the impugned order in E.C.Act Case No. 90/2013-S7 dt. 10-4-2013, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JOSEPH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.14781 of 2013 ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing, Mr.I.Ajay Krishna, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:13.08.2025 KGR