Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010264322019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11968/2019 Between: Dr. K. Haribabu, ...PETITIONER AND State Of A P and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B M PATRO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. TANDASA RADHA RANI
2. B JAGADISH
3. JAGADISH KUAMAR BATCHU The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the official respondents to restore the place of the petitioner at Area Hospital, Rajam, Srikakulam district by setting aside the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing Rc.No.APVVPE-GT-2019
2
- Medical, dtd. 12-07-2019 of the even date passed in my case as well as the 4th respondent herein including the consequential impugned proceedings bearing Rc.No.305/EI/2019, dtd.13-07-2019 passed by the 3rd respondent declaring them as arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of Constitution of India besides violation of the relevant guidelines of the general transfers 2019 and pass such other order or orders……”
2. Sri B.M.Patro, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents, is in attendance.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. No order as to Costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 19.03.2025 ARR
3
51 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11968/2019
Dt.19.03.2025
ARR