RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10159/2025 · 2025-10-17
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10159 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has sought for the following substantial reliefs:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'Mandamus' commanding the Respondent No. 1 to 3; to not allow the Opposite Party No. 4 to participate in the auction proceedings of Chinhara Village of Gata No. 325, 400, 255, 482. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'Mandamus' commanding the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to consider the application/representation of the petitioner (as contained in Annexure No.6 to this writ petition)."
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that respondent No.4, who has also applied for the auction, is not a resident and should not be allowed to participate in the said auction.
4. We are of the view that this writ petition is premature at this stage.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court at the appropriate stage, if any Versus
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Singh, Kushendra Kumar Singh Rathour Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
cause of action arises for the same. October 17, 2025 cks/-
WRIC No. 10159 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench