JAINARAYAN S/O HARSAHAI MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6723/2025 · 2025-06-11
Anand Sharma V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18973 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18973 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23070] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6723/2025 Jainarayan S/o Harsahai Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sirra Ki Dhani, Dausa, Police Station Dausa, Kotwali, Presently Moda Patti, Police Station Dausa, Sadar, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 11/06/2025
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No. 50/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhayakpuri District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 308(4), 308(5) and 61(2) of BNS and Section 66 of IT Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused Rakesh Joshi has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this court vide
order dated 13.05.2025 passed in SB Criminal Misc. IInd Bail Application No. 6081/2025 and case of the present petitioner is on better footing than of co-accused Rakesh Joshi. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. Counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner is
[2025:RJ-JP:23070] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6723/2025] behind the bar since long. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the accused-petitioner may be allowed to enlarge on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made at Bar.
5. Taking into consideration, the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the fact that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this court and case of the present petitioner is on better footing and he would no longer be required for custodial interrogation, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Jainarayan S/o Harsahai Meena, shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 50/2025 registered at Police Station Vidhayakpuri District Jaipur City (South) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court.
[2025:RJ-JP:23070] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6723/2025]
7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise.
(ANAND SHARMA (V.J.)),J ashu /226