HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 23458 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Pankaj Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application has been filed by the applicants to quash the charge-sheet dated 5.11.2024 and summoning/cognizance order dated 29.3.2025 as well as entire proceedings of Case no. 8885 of 2025 (State vs. Ramu and another) arising out of Case Crime no. 223 of 2024 under sections 115(2), 74, 76, 352 BNS, PS- Fatehpur Sikri, District Agra. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants have submitted that he relinquishes the prayer for quashment and wishes to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer so made. 5. Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicants appears before the court concerned within four weeks from today and move application for bail, if there is no other legal impediment before learned court concerned, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashok Kumar Gupta, G.A. Ramu And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 7. It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicant. 8. With the above direction, the instant application stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that none of the grounds are convincing for seeking quashing of orders impugned along with entire proceeding. October 15, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 23458 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad