SHIV PRASAD PAINULY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND, THROUGH COLLECTOR, NEW TEHRI, DISTRICT- TEHRI GARHWAL
SA/13/2011 · 2025-02-21
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1897 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1897 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
SA No.13 of 2011 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. None appears for the appellant.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing counsel for the State.
3. The appeal has yet not been admitted though pending since 2011, it appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal, therefore, the instant second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 21.02.2025 R.Bisht
`