RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV AND 75 OTHERS v. SHRI SANJAY PRASAD AND ANOTHER
CAPL/4002/2025 · 2025-10-14
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189671 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189671 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4002 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Opposite party has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly.
2. Learned Standing Counsel representing opposite party states that the claim of the present applicants for want of additional increment has been decided in their favour in compliance of the order passed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants has admitted the order passed by the opposite party accepting their claim for one additional increment.
4. In this conspectus, as above, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application.
5. As such, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 15, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mirza Faheem Beg Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Ramesh Chandra Yadav And 75 Others .....Applicant(s) Shri Sanjay Prasad And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad