Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18967 (AP)

KILARAPU SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13113/2024 · 2025-07-02

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010264202024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. KILARAPU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. REDDYMMA AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 31 PAMARRU MANDAL, N.T.R. DISTRICT, PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AT AMARAVATI. 2. THE STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. FINANCE DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOUSING VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, NIRMAN BHAVAN, AUTO NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRI MANAGING DIRECTOR. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ( PR) WING KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 13113/2024 KILARAPU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. REDDYMMA AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 31-77, PAMARRU, PAMARRU MANDAL, N.T.R. DISTRICT, PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AT THE STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. FINANCE DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, , GUNTUR DISTRICT. AMARAVATI. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL , HOUSING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, NIRMAN BHAVAN, AUTO NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ( PR) WING KRISHNA DISTRICT AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3328] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA KILARAPU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. REDDYMMA AGE ABOUT 49 77, PAMARRU, PAMARRU MANDAL, N.T.R. DISTRICT, PREVIOUSLY KRISHNA ...PETITIONER SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AT THE STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. FINANCE DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THE A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, NIRMAN BHAVAN, CT. REP. BY ITS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ( PR) WING KRISHNA DISTRICT AT 2 6. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 7. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 8. THE DISTRICT HEADHOUSING, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 9. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DIVISION KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. E V JAGANNADHA RAO (SC FOR AP STATE HOUSEING COOP LTD) 4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 5. GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Manasa, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Pamarthi Kameswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri P. Soma Raju, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Housing. 2. Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Machilipatnam, dated 02.07.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3 3. The Payment Summary of the Written Instructions would indicate that the total work done by the Writ Petitioner is for a valuation of Rs.22,89,619/-. The Statutory Recoveries are to an extent of Rs.3,54,085/- and the balance amount to be paid to the Petitioner is Rs.19,35,534/-. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner does not dispute this Payment Summary. 5. In this view of the matter, the Official Respondents are directed to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra- departmental, by mutual cooperation and coordination within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today, and to transfer the balance amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (04) weeks thereafter. 6. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the bank account details to the Competent Authority within a period of two (02) weeks from today. 7. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.07.2025 DSV 4 81 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.13113 of 2024 03.07.2025 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No.W.P.No.13113 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 04. 03.07.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is allowed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6