Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18966 (KAR)

SHRI.SACHINDA S.J. v. THE HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED

WP/7254/2024 · 2025-02-10

S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5822 WP No. 7254 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.7254 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI.SACHINDRA.S.J., S/O LATE S.V. JAYARAM, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR CHIEF SUPERVISOR ADMINISTRATION IN HAL, R/AT NO.14/3, 10TH 'C' MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MUNIRAJ GOWDA V., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR.V.S.SRINIVAS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DIVISION, VIMANAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 017. Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5822 WP No. 7254 of 2024 2. PRADNYA SAINI, CHIEF MANAGER (HR) AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. SMT. PRAMILA M.C., D/O SHRI. M.CHANNEGOWDA, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR ACCOUNTANT IN HAL, R/AT NO.G-161, GROUND FLOOR, 5TH MAIN, H.A.L. OLD TOWNSHIP, VIMANAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 017. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SYED KASHIF ALI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.PRADEEP S SAWKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED SECOND SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO.FMD/HR/60-24/1093/2024 TO THE PETITIONER, COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE - B DATED 16.02.2024 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5822 WP No. 7254 of 2024 ORAL ORDER No representation for the petitioner. 2. Heard Sri. Syed Kashif Ali, learned counsel for Sri. Pradeep.S.Sawkar, learned counsel for the caveator/ respondent No.1. 3. On going through the petition averments, it is seen that the petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the second show-cause notice bearing No.FMD/HR/60-24/1093/2024 dated 16.02.2024 (Annexure-B) issued by respondent No.1. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 files a memo dated 10.02.2025 enclosing order/award of punishment dated 09.03.2024, wherein the petitioner is imposed punishment of "Stoppage of 5 increments with cumulative effect" under Rule 27 (iii) of HAL Standing Orders. 4. In view of the subsequent imposition of penalty, the writ petition challenging second show-cause notice would no more survive for consideration. Accordingly, writ - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:5822 WP No. 7254 of 2024 petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order/award of punishment. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30