Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189644 (ALL)

BANTI @ VIRENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/981/2025 · 2025-02-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18436 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 981 of 2025 Applicant :- Banti @ Virendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record. 2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. , under Sections I.P.C., P.S. , District . 3. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for applicant submits that present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922". 4. Learned A.G.A. has raised objection that the applicant has five cases of criminal history, hence he is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the applicant, namely, Banti @ Virendra appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 6. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. 7. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad