Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189641 (ALL)

JAGBHAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/24131/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24131 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Om Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anurag Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 111 of 2024, under Sections 109 B.N.S., P.S. Kadaura, District Jalaun. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated by his father-in-law as he was having issue with his wife who is injured. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that specific allegation has been made against the applicant for causing injuries to the injured which is duly substantiated by the injury report of the injured. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account that specific allegation of causing head injury has been made against the applicant and the injury report shows that there is depressed comminuted fracture which is dangerous to life, this Court is not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. October 15, 2025 Vandana Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Om Prakash Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Jagbhan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad