Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18962 (GAU)

NANDINI EDUCARE v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/6678/2021 · 2025-08-17

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202742021 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6678/2021 NANDINI EDUCARE 4TH FLOOR, TRIBENI COMPLEX, ULUBARI, G.S ROAD, GUWAHATI 781007 (A PROPRIETOR FIRM) REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MRS. NANDINI DUTTA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SHRI NRIPEN DUTTA, A RESIDENT OF VIP ROAD, AZARA, GUWAHATI 15, KAMRUP M ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY, HARYANA MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILIATATION COUNCIL CUM DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, HARYANA, 30 BAYS BUILDING, SECTOR 17, CHANDIGARH, PUNJAB 122001 2:SHRI SATISH AHLAWAT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE (RETD.) SOLE ARBITRATOR HOUSE NO. W-7/12 DLF PHASE III GURGAON 122001 HARYANA 3:ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE GURUGRAM HARYANA 4:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE TAXATION DEPARTMENT Page No.# 2/3 DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 5:TOPIO YFM DESIGNS PVT. LTD. PLOT NO. 5430 PACE CITY 2 SECTOR 37 GURUGRAM 122001 HARYANA 6:HDFC BANK LTD. NH- 37 BIJOYNAGAR KAMRUP ASSAM- 781122 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D P CHALIHA, MR L P SHARMA,MD R ALI,MS N BURAGOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, MR S A HUSSAIN (r-6),MR. M SMITH (r-6) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 18.08.2025 Heard Mr. D. P. Chaliha, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. M. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. A. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.6. Mr. D. P. Chaliha, learned senior counsel, on instructions has submitted that he be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, for assailing the order impugned in the present proceedings. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above position, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed Page No.# 3/3 on withdrawal, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for assailing the order impugned in the present proceedings within a period of 45(Forty Five) days from today. Till the period of 45(Forty Five) days the interim order passed by this Court vide order dated 15.12.2021 shall continue to subsist. JUDGE Comparing Assistant