ASHISH GORAI ALIAS ASHIS GORAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6118/2025 · 2025-07-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18960 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18960 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:19950] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6118 of 2025
------ Ashish Gorai @ Ashis Gorai, aged about 25 years, son of Budheswar Gorai, Resident of Village Ganjia, Post Gamharia, Police Station Gamharia, District Seraikella Kharsawan .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Amrit Kumari, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-21-07-2025
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.59 of 2025 arising out of Gamharia P.S. Case No.135 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons has committed murder of Sonu Sardar. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that though charge has been framed but no witness has been examined in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.12.2024 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.05.2025 in B.A. No.3658 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of
the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella in connection with S.T. Case No.59 of 2025 arising out of Gamharia P.S. Case No.135 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/