SURAKHA KUMARI v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/1011/2015 · 2025-09-10
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1896 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1896 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 32 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1011/2015
Surakha Kumari …. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
State of J&K & Ors. …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 10.09.2025
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on previous dated of hearing. Today also same is the position. It appears that the petitioners are no longer interested in prosecuting the instant petition. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
Judge JAMMU Amit 10.09.2025