Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18958 (RAJ)

SAMEER S/O AZIZ KHAN @ AZIZ TADA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6397/2025 · 2025-07-14

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26087] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6397/2025 Sameer S/o Aziz Khan @ Aziz Tada, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Chamanpura Thana Udeimod Gangapur City District Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Gangapur City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 14/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0078/2025 registered at Police Station-Udai Mod, District-Sawai Madhopur for offences under Sections 8/21 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. As per prosecution story, 12.40 gram of smack was recovered from the present petitioner, which is below the commercial quantity. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 27.04.2025 and charge- sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the [2025:RJ-JP:26087] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6397/2025] petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that recovered quantity of smack is below the commercial quantity but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Sameer S/o Aziz Khan @ Aziz Tada shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/157