SUBHASH CHANDRA YADAV v. SHRI DINESH CHANDRA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/3806/2025 · 2025-10-14
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189573 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189573 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3806 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. List revised. None appears for the applicant.
2. Opposite party has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly.
3. Learned Standing Counsel representing opposite party states that the representation moved by the present applicant has been decided, vide order dated 10.10.2025 in compliance of the order dated 5.3.2024 passed by this Court. He further states that now no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application; therefore, same may be dismissed as infructuous.
4. In this conspectus, as above, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 15, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Subhash Chandra Yadav .....Applicant(s) Shri Dinesh Chandra, District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad