Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189570 (ALL)

ANKIT YADAV v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/9388/2024 · 2025-10-07

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9388 of 2024 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. The mediation report records that the mediation has not succeeded. Moreover, this writ petition arose out of an offence under Section 376 IPC. Learned AGA for the State-respondents and Sri Mani Shanker Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.3 are present. Names of counsel for the petitioner are shown in the cause list. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 8, 2025 Shahroz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, Yash Raj Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Mani Shanker Pandey (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Ankit Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad