Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18957 (KAR)

THE BRANCH MANAGER v. SMT N NITHYA

MFA/17/2015 · 2025-06-12

Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20115 MFA No. 17 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2015 (MV-D) BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., PREMA COMPLEX, B.H. ROAD, BHADRAVATHI, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., BANGALORE REGIONAL OFFICE-670000, MOTOR THIRD PARTY CLAIMS HUB, MAHALAKSHMI COMPLEX, M.G ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 001. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.B.R.VENKATESH KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. N. NITHYA , W/O TEJAS, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 2. KUM. N KAVYA, D/O LATE C. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT OMKARA NILAYA, JANNAPURA, R/AT OMKARA NILAYA Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20115 MFA No. 17 of 2015 JANNAPURA BHADRAVATHI-577 301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VASANTH MADHAV, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:22.08.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.527/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE FAST TRACK COURT, ADDITIONAL MACT-V, BHADRAVATHI, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF Rs. 11,41,400/- WITH INTEREST @ % FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL PAYMENT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo, which reads as under: "It is submitted that on reconsideration the appellant does not wish to prosecute the appeal. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the appellant to withdraw the appeal and to dismiss it as not pressed and also direct transfer of the amounts in deposit to Hon'ble MACT, Bhadravathi". - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20115 MFA No. 17 of 2015 2. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 3. The amount deposited by the appellant - Insurance Company before this Court shall be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal for disbursement in favour of the claimants on due identification. Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19