( 2025:JHHC:24169 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4567 of 2025 Petitioner ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P. 05/ 19.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajmahal Mahila P.S. Case No. 08 of 2024, registered under sections 79, 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023, corresponding section 509, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 (A) of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is husband of the informant. He submits that earlier informant has filed a complaint case being Complaint Case No. 392 of 2024 for the offence under sections 323, 504, 341, 380, 313, 307, 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and the said case is still pending and even summon has not been issued and in the meantime present false case has been lodged against the petitioner on the false allegation of sharing photographs. He submits that all the sections are bailable except section 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegation of sharing photograph is there. 5. In view of above and considering that petitioner is husband of the informant , the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and the learned court will release the petitioner on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit and proper. 6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-