Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18957 (CHH)

RAM NARAYAN NAG v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/117/2025 · 2025-06-22

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26962 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 117 of 2025 1 - Ram Narayan Nag S/o Shri Kuntalal Nag Aged About 40 Years Presenlty Working As Assistant Fisheries Officer, North Bastar Kanker, District Bastar Kanker (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Fisheries, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur(C.G.). 2 - Director Directorate Of Fisheries, Indrawati Bhawan, 4th Floor, B- Block, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Savitri Luxmi Chandrakar W/o Dr. Gajendra Baghel Aged About 48 Years Presenlty Working As Pharmacist Grade Lind At Dr. Br Ambedkar Memorial Hospital Medical College Raipur And Residing At Behind Balaji Hospital Prakash Furniture Lane, Dubey Colony Mowa Raipur (C.G.). Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 23/06/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following prayer:- “It is therefore, prayed, that this Hon’ble Court may graciously pleased to allow this review petition, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 at the very outset submits that this review petition itself is not maintainable as order has been passed against respondent No. 3 as such at present there is nothing to review the order passed by this Court. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present review petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat