Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189536 (ALL)

KANCHAN PANDEY v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15810/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15810 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sheel Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner is presently posted as Head Constable in Ballia and he seeks transfer to Prayagraj on the ground of medical ailment. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be decided at the first instance by Respondent no.2. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2 by 07.11.2025, who shall thereafter proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months thereafter. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpan Kumar Pandey, Sheel Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Kanchan Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad