Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189520 (MAD)

MANIMEGALAI v. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER

WP/46212/2025 · 2025-12-02

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 46212 of 2025 __________Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-12-2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 46212 of 2025 MANIMEGALAI ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer,District Collector Office, Salem. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,Revenue Divisional Office, Attur, Salem District. 3. The Thasildar,Pethanayakkanpalayam Taluk Office, Prthanayakkanpalayam, Salem District. ..Respondents Direct the respondent 1 to 3 to issue patta in the petitioners favour in respect of Survey No.1014/1 for an extent of 42 Cents, which is situated at Chinnakalrayan north Revenue Village, pethanayakanpalayam Taluk, Salem District on the basis of the petitioners representation dated 06/10/2025 within a time limit that may be fixed by this Honourable Court. For Petitioner: MR.K.ARUNRAJ For Respondents: MR R.P MURUGAN RAJA,GA ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46212 of 2025 __________Page 2 of 4 2.The petitioner claims that she is the owner of the aforementioned property and is in possession of the same. She has submitted an application with the respondents seeking for issuance of patta in her name. Since the said application has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 4.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 5.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 6.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation seeking for issuance of patta. 7.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the online application seeking for issuance of patta for the property morefully https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46212 of 2025 __________Page 3 of 4 described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 02-12-2025 vga To 1. The District Revenue Officer,District Collector Office, Salem. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,Revenue Divisional Office, Attur, Salem District. 3. The Thasildar,Pethanayakkanpalayam Taluk Office, Prthanayakkanpalayam, Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46212 of 2025 __________Page 4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. VGA WP No. 46212 of 2025 02-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis