Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189490 (MAD)

PARAMASIVAM v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/49741/2025 · 2025-12-19

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.49741 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.12.2025 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice Abdul Quddhose W.P.No.49741 of 2025 PARAMASIVAM ...Petitioner Vs. 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PERAMBALUR COLLECTORATE, PERAMBALUR 621212. 2 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER OFFICE OF DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICE PERAMBALUR 621212. 3 THE SUB COLLECTOR OFFICE OF COLLECTORATE PERAMBALUR 621220. 4 THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, PERAMBALUR 621212. ...Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 18.09.2025 and pass appropriate orders on merits by conducting enquiries in respect of petitioner’s property at Old Survey Nos.467/1 467/14 and 467/24 situated at Perambalur Village, Perambalur Taluk and District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.49741 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.B.Manimaran For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate Order With consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 18.09.2025 seeking for correction of UDR entries for the property (morefully described in the prayer to this Writ Petition) within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 3. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks for correction of UDR entries based on his representation dated 18.09.2025 referred to supra. 4. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.49741 of 2025 5. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation dated 18.09.2025 is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court after hearing objections, if any, of the neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom, the second respondent deems it fit to enquire. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the representation made by the petitioner. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 18.09.2025 seeking for correction of the UDR entries for the property (morefully described in the prayer to this Writ Petition) as prayed for in the petitioner’s representation dated 18.09.2025 after hearing the objections of neighbouring landowners as well as any other third party, whom, the second respondents deems it fit to enquire within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.49741 of 2025 7. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 19.12.2025 sd Index : yes/no Neutral Citation : yes/no To 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PERAMBALUR COLLECTORATE, PERAMBALUR 621212. 2 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER OFFICE OF DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICE PERAMBALUR 621212. 3 THE SUB COLLECTOR OFFICE OF COLLECTORATE PERAMBALUR 621220. 4 THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, PERAMBALUR 621212. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.49741 of 2025 Abdul Quddhose,J., sd W.P.No.49741 of 2025 19.12.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis