Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18946 (GAU)

JAHIRUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3101/2025 · 2025-09-18

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202402025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3101/2025 JAHIRUL ISLAM S/O. LT. NAIMUL ISLAM, R/O. VILL.- SILPUKHURI, P/O. SILPUKHURI, P/S. MIKIRBHETA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782123 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (P AND RD) DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC) FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT BEING REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN NAMELY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTE (DLC) FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT MORIGAON REP. BY THE DEPUTY/DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON CUM CHAIRMAN DLC MORIGAON Advocate for the Petitioner : K A SODIAL, K A SODIAL,MS. S T BOKTH,MR. J M A CHOUDHURY,MR. S K TALUKDAR Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : CRP/0/0 JAHIRUL ISLAM ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS ASSAM ------------ For petitioner/appellant(s) : Mr. S.K. Talukdar, Advocate Mr. K.A. Sodial, Advocate For respondent(s) : Mr. P. Saikia, GA, Assam – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 19.09.2025 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant seeking condonation of delay of 153 days in preferring an appeal against the judgment and order dated 06.03.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No. 350/2023 and other connected writ petitions. We have heard Mr. S. K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and Mr. P. Saikia, learned Government Advocate, Assam, for the respondents. Considering the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that Page No.# 3/3 good grounds have been assigned by the applicant/appellant for condoning the delay of 153 days in preferring the appeal. We, therefore, condone the delay. The Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Registry to process the appeal and if it is found to be error-free, list the same on 14.11.2025 under appropriate heading. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant