BRAJESH SHUKLA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/33465/2025 · 2025-10-14
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33465 of 2025 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Compliance affidavit filed today on behalf of the State is taken on record.
2. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Rahul Kumar Gupta, Advocate, on behalf of the informant, is taken on record.
3. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Rahul Kumar Gupta,
learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
4. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned charge-sheet dated 28.08.2024, summoning order dated 18.12.2024 as well as entire proceeding in Session Case No.1395 of 2024 (State vs. Brajesh Shukla and others) arising out of Case Crime No.205 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(2) B.N.S. & Section 3(1)Da, Dha & 3(2)(Va) of S.C./S.T. Act, P.S.Ramchandra Mission, District Shahjahanpur, pending in the court of Special Judge SC/ST Act/A.S.J. IInd, Shahjahanpur.
5. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.
6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.
7. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Brajesh Shukla And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
8. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is
directed that applicants shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.
9. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.
10. With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. stands disposed of. October 15, 2025 SKD NA528 No. 33465 of 2025 2 (Deepak Verma,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad