[2025:RJ-JP:23146] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6368/2025 Neelu Singh Kushwaha S/o Bharat Singh Kushwaha, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Plot No. 754, Kunda Basti, Jhalana Dungari Jaipur. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Sharma Mr. Jitin Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 12/06/2025 1. This instant application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S is filed by the applicant-accused Neelu Singh Kushwaha S/o Bharat Singh Kushwaha for seeking anticipatory bail in event of arrest in connection with FIR No.111/2025 dated 10.04.2025 registered at P.S. Malviya Nagar, District Jaipur City (East), for alleged offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 110 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has falsely implicated in a concocted criminal case. He also submitted that the applicant may be arrested due to ulterior motive, and to fulfill personal vendetta of complainant though there is no evidence against the applicant. He further submitted that the applicant is a law abiding citizen, having no previous criminal antecedents, but he assured full cooperation with Investigating Agency. [2025:RJ-JP:23146] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6368/2025] 3. Learned counsel submits that initially present applicant has registered FIR No.110/2025 and to counter blast, the same FIR No.111/2025 was registered by present complainant. He further submitted that in the instant case, main accused is a juvenile, who was already taken in custody and further released on bail. He also submitted that the alleged stick used in assault was also recovered from juvenile, and no recovery is contemplated against the applicant. He also submits that this applicant was in jurisdiction of Sitapura and same is evident from E-way bill submitted by him. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations against the applicant are grave and serious, therefore, at the stage of investigation, the applicant- accused is required for investigation, hence, he is not entitled to grant anticipatory bail. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record submitted by both the parties. 6. Having considered the police report and the material placed on record for perusal, the matter is still at the investigation stage, but the investigation so far indicates that the applicant-accused is not required for custodial interrogation. A juvenile was detained in the instant case, and he was already released on bail. Considering the assurance of cooperation, and also the fact that there is no criminal antecedents against the applicant-accused, without expressing any opinion on role of the present applicant-accused it is appropriate to grant anticipatory bail. [2025:RJ-JP:23146] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6368/2025] 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S, is hereby allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of applicant-accused Neelu Singh Kushwaha S/o Bharat Singh Kushwaha in connection with FIR No.111/2025 dated 10.04.2025 registered at P.S. Malviya Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 110 of B.N.S, the applicant Neelu Singh Kushwaha S/o Bharat Singh Kushwaha shall be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i) Till completion of investigation, the applicant shall not leave the jurisdiction of the concerned District without prior permission of the concerned Court. (ii) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required in relation to present criminal case. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Investigating Officer during investigation. (iv) The applicant shall not tamper with any evidence or try to influence any witness in any manner. (v) The applicant shall disclose his passport number, if any, to Investigating Officer and shall not leave the Country without prior permission from the concerned Court. [2025:RJ-JP:23146] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6368/2025] (vi) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (vii) Failure to comply with any of the aforementioned conditions, shall entail the cancellation of the anticipatory bail order. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GARIMA /292