Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189417 (ALL)

MOHD SHUEB v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34615/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34615 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 493 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3),115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 61(2), 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station- Lohiya Nagar, District Meerut. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was not named in the FIR and general allegations have been made against all the accused persons. It is further submitted that all the injuries are simple in nature and no specific role has been assigned to the applicant for causing injuries. He further submitted that the injured in his statement has assigned role to co-accused Kafe and Shafiq for causing injury. It is further argued that charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. The applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 16.09.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avnish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd Shueb .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Mohd Shueb involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 9. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. October 15, 2025 A.Kr. BAIL No. 34615 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad