Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189405 (ALL)

RAKESH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/42186/2024 · 2025-02-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:19990-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42186 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. 1. Petitioner is essentially aggrieved by an order of cane reservation/assignment passed by the Cane Commissioner allocating respective cane centre to the sugar mill in question. 2. In the event any such person is aggrieved by such reservation order, the remedy would be to prefer an appeal under Section 15 (4) of the U.P. Sugarcane Supply and Purchase Act, 1953. A representation would not be proper remedy against the order of reservation. 3. Leaving it open to aggrieved person to prefer an appeal before the State Government in terms of the statutory scheme, this petition is consigned to records. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Kumar Manish Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad