HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35948 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashish Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Arimardan Singh Rajpoot, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 3. Submission is, the petitioner is neither the proprietor of Yaduvanshi Rice Mill nor he is legal representative of the proprietor of the said Yaduvanshi Rice Mill, namely Narendra Singh who died during pandemic, Covid-19. Petitioner further claims that he has never operated the said rice mill and no estate of deceased Narendra Singh has come to his hands. 4. Claiming to be a complete stranger to the recovery being attempted to recover the dues of the deceased Narendra Singh, petitioner further claims that he has filed written objections dated 08.08.2025 before the District Magistrate, Etah (Annexure 6). Those are also pending. 5. On the other hand, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel states, facts have not been ascertained. At the same it has not been shown that the objection filed by the petitioner has been dealt with or decided. 6. In view of the above, no useful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending or calling for counter affidavit, at this stage. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is writ petition is disposed of with the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Mishra, Dhir Man Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jitendra Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) following observations: (i) Petitioner may file fresh objection before respondent No. 2 with respect to the impugned recovery certificate dated 17.07.2025, on or before 27.10.2025. (ii) The above objection may be filed supported by personal affidavit of the petitioner, enclosing thereto all the documents on which the petitioner may seek to rely. (iii) On such compliance being made, the respondent no. 2 may call for appropriate report from the revenue authorities and if any adverse material comes to light, the same may be confronted to the petitioner within a further period of one month from the date of the aforesaid compliance shown by the petitioner. (iv) Thereafter the petitioner may be given two weeks' time to respond to such adverse material. Appropriate date for personal hearing may be fixed within a further period of two weeks. (v) Subject to such compliances appropriate reasoned order may be passed by the respondent No. 2 after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, before 31.03.2026. 8. Subject to compliances made by the petitioner, no coercive measure may be adopted pursuant to the impugned recovery till 13.04.2026. October 15, 2025 Nadeem WRIC No. 35948 of 2025 2 (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad