- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10239 WP No. 6178 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 6178 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.C.B.NARAYANASWAMY S/O.MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT AGRAHARA LAYOUT YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK. PIN CODE-560 064. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJA B S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, N. R. ROAD, BENGALURU 560 002. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER - YALAHANKA ZONE, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10239 WP No. 6178 of 2025 BYATARAYANAPURA BENGALURU - 560 026 4. THE REVENUE OFFICER BYTARAYANAPURA DIVISION, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BYATARAYANAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 026 … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1; SRI PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD. 18.02.2025 ISSUED AND PUBLISHED BY THE R-4 PROPOSING AND FIXING OPEN PUBLIC AUCTION SALE OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Petitioner has filed the present petition challenging the notice dated 18.02.2025 proposing and fixing public auction of the schedule property at Annexure-A. Petitioner has also challenged the property attachment order dated 10.06.2024. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10239 WP No. 6178 of 2025 2. The demand as contained in the Proclamation and Written Notice of Sale at Annexure-A is Rs.68,810/-. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which contains a receipt for having paid Rs.69,146/-. 4. In light of the same, question of adjudication does not arise as the liability of the BBMP stands satisfied and the learned counsel for respondent - BBMP submits that the amount paid satisfies the demand at Annexure-A. 5. The present dispute relates to the proceedings initiated through Annexure-A. In light of tax liability having been satisfied, the written notice of sale of immovable property would not be in operation any more insofar as the subject matter of demand at Annexure-A. Any consequential proceedings pursuant to Annexure-A also cannot be proceeded with. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:10239 WP No. 6178 of 2025 6. Accordingly, petition is disposed off as not calling for any adjudication, taking note of the subsequent events. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP