HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12539 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue an order or direction to decide the 6C application dated 18.04.2024 filed in Suit No. 950 of 2024 (Smt. Jyoti Vishwakarma Vs. Vinod Kumar Rai & Others) pending before the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No.6, Varanasi expeditiously preferably within a stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and direct to the concerned court to issue order for maintain status quo over the land in dispute." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhupesh Pathak, Surya Bhan Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Smt. Jyoti Vishwakarma .....Petitioner(s) Vinod Kumar Rai And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No.6, Varanasi to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 15, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12539 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad