Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189371 (ALL)

HIMANSHU VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35937/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35937 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri R.C.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rohit Pandey on behalf of respondents. 2. This writ petition does not have any necessary averment which co- relates with the prayer, therefore, the reliefs sought cannot be granted. 3. In the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that petitioner can still raise his grievance before the concerned respondent in accordance with law. October 15, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rohit Pandey (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Himanshu Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad