[2025:RJ-JP:21870] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6098/2025 1. Manjeet Singh Son Of Shri Ramjilal Yadav, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Neemli Police Station Kotwali Neemkathana District Sikar Rajasthan ( At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana) 2. Sisram Yadav Son Of Shri Banwari Lal Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Neemli Police Station Kotwali Neemkathana District Sikar Rajasthan ( At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6394/2025 Raju Urf Rajendra Son Of Shri Kuldaram, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Bheekhawali Tan Aagwadi Police Station Kotwali Neemkathana District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sab Jail Sikar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bhinda with Mr. Atar Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG Mr. Mahish Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.89/2025 registered at Police Station-Neem Ka Thana (Sikar), District-Sikar for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 332(c), 351(2), 352, 110 and 3(5) [2025:RJ-JP:21870] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6098/2025] of BNS, 2023. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these case. Counsel further submits that the name of the petitioners have not been mentioned in the FIR. The so called injury caused to the injured are not dangerous to life. Petitioners are behind the bars since 25.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications and submitted that the petitioners with brutality assaulted to the injured Khayali Ram who was 59 years old person, therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for bail. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Manjeet Singh Son Of Shri Ramjilal Yadav, Sisram Yadav Son Of Shri Banwari Lal Yadav and Raju Urf Rajendra Son Of Shri [2025:RJ-JP:21870] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6098/2025] Kuldaram shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/256-257