Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18931 (GAU)

MAHIBUL HOQUE ALIAS MOHIBUL HOQUE ALIAS MONI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/987/2025 · 2025-09-07

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010202512025 2025:GAU-AS:12166 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/987/2025 MAHIBUL HOQUE ALIAS MOHIBUL HOQUE ALIAS MONI SON OF ABDUS SAMAD AHMED RESIDENT OF VILL AZAD NAGAR UNDER BARPETA POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : S J DUTTA, MS D DAS,MR. M K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 08-09-2025 Heard learned counsel Mr. M.K. Das for the applicant Mahibul Hoque @ Mohibul Hoque @ Moni. 2. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. S.H. Bora for the respondent State. Page No.# 2/2 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that inadvertently in the cause title of Bail Application No. 2534/2025, the name of applicant’s father was referred to Late Abdus Samad Ahmed. 4. It is submitted that there was a typographical error in inserting ‘Late’ as the applicant’s father is alive. 5. The error in the cause title of Bail Application No. 2534/2025 as well as the order of this Court dated 02.09.2025 in Bail Application No. 2534/2025 may be corrected and the word ‘Late’ may be deleted from the title of the name of the applicant’s father. 6. Amended cause title may be submitted by the applicant. 7. In terms of the above observation, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant