Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18929 (GAU)

SHRI KAJAL DAS AND ANR v. BIJOY BORO

Crl.Pet./1116/2025 · 2025-10-07

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010202032025 2025:GAU-AS:13578 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1116/2025 SHRI KAJAL DAS AND ANR SON OF LATE KABINDRA DAS RESIDENT OF AAKASHDEEP COMPLEX, GANGA, ITANAGAR, P.S. BANKTINALI, PIN-791113, ARUNACHAL PRADESH. 2: SHRI NITESH DAS SON OF SHRI KAJAL DAS RESIDENT OF AAKASHDEEP COMPLEX GANGA ITANAGAR P.S. BANKTINALI PIN-791113 ARUNACHAL PRADESH VERSUS BIJOY BORO SON OF BICHHURAM BORO RESIDENT OF GARAIMARI, P.S. GOBARDHANA, IN THE DISTRICT OF BAKSA BTR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR I RAFIQUE, MS A AFREEN,N CHAKRABORTY,MRS S A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 08.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. I. Rafique, learned counsel assisted by Ms. S.A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. I. Rafique, learned counsel assisted by Ms. S.A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he wishes to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file a fresh one, as the State needs to be impleaded as a party, which has not been done. 3. It is submitted that, for this technical reason, the prayer may be allowed. 4. Having considered the matter, the instant criminal petition is disposed of on withdrawal; with a liberty to file a fresh one after impleading all the necessary parties. JUDGE Comparing Assistant