IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1247 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, filed against the Order passed in I.A. No. 1/2024 in O.S. No. 5/2024, on the file of court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate Mobile Court, Rampachodavaram, Between: Gondela Lakshmana Rao, S/o.Venkateswara Rao, aged 66 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...PETITIONER (Petitioner / Plaintiff) AND 1. Gorrumuchu Venkanna, S/o.Punnaiah, aged 56 years, R/o. Nellipaka Village, Yetapaka Mandal, Alluri Sitharamaraju District. 2. Bella Chittemma, , W/o.Venkata Rao, Aged 61 years, R/o. Sarapaka Village Burgampahad Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...RESPONDENTS (Respondents / Defendants) : SRI. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following Order: r APHCOI0262422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R F^AGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1247/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Gondela Lakshrnana Rao AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Gorrumuchu Venkanna and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BOLL-A VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following order: The petitioner herein, claiming ownership and possession of over Ac.5.00 cents of land in Sy.No.82/1 of Nellipaka Village, Yetapaka Mandal of Alluri Sita Ramaraju District, approached the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mobile Court, Rampachodavaram, by way of O.S.No.5 of 2024, seeking for a permanent injunction, against the respondents herein, restraining them from interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the said land. 2 RRR, J C.R.P.No.1247 of 2025 The petitioner had also moved I.A.No.1 of 2024, for grant of 2. temporary injunction, which is still pending. The petitioner has now approached this Court with the contention 3. that the Trial Court was not passing any orders on the application for temporary injunction, despite passage of more than a year and despite notices being served on the respondents long back. Sri Bella Venkata Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner 4. would submit that the delay in deciding the Interlocutory Application was causing immense loss and pr€5judice to the land of the petitioner, as the respondents continue to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the land. The fact that an application for temporary injunction has remained 5. pending for about 1 72 years is a sufficient reason for this Court to intervene under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is the responsibility of the Court to ensure early disposal of 6. applications for temporary injunction, in as much as any delay in the disposal of such applications could cause change in the very nature of the suit. In the circumstances, this Civil Revision F^etition is disposed of, 7. directing the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mobile Court, Rampachodavaram, to dispose of I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O S.No.5 of 2024, at the earliest and at any rate within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of this order. w 3 RRRJ C.R.P.No.l247of2025 Notices to the respondents would not be necessary in as much as the order passed by this Court is only for early disposal of the application, and there is no finding or direction in relation to the merits of the case. There shall 8. be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- U SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sfeflON OFFICER To, Divisional Magistrate Mobile Court, Rampachodavaram Bella Venkata Rama Rao Advocate [OPUCJ 1. The Sub 2. OneCCto Sri 3. Three CD Copies Psr vna HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 ORDER CRP.No.1247of2025 I t? JUN2I)25 I Current Section . ^ DISPOSING OF THE CRP WITHOUT COSTS