Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12525 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"Issue nature a in writ or direction the of mandamus directing the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Kannauj to decide the 6C Application in Original Suit No. 179 of 2025 (Avnish Vs. Vimal and others) pending before him, within a stipulated period of time."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Kannauj to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anit Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Avnish .....Petitioner(s) Vimal And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 15, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12525 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad