Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189253 (ALL)

RASHU KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/16895/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16895 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application despite the fact that one learned counsel and one Senior Advocate are appearing in the matter. Sri Abhimanu Mishra and Sri Indra Deo Mishra, learned counsels for the first informant are also not present. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned A.G.A. for the State is present. 3. This third bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 2 of 2024, under Section 7 Prevention of Corruption Act, registered at P.S. Bareilly Sector Vigilance Establishment, District Bareilly. 4. The first bail application of the applicant being Criminal Misc.Bail Application No. 28368 of 2024 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 4.9.2024. The second bail application of the applicant being Criminal Misc.Bail Application No. 44209 of 2024 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 2.1.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ranjit Kumar Yadav, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhimanu Mishra, G.A., Indra Deo Mishra Rashu Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Since there is no representation on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application even in the revised list, the same is dismissed in non prosecution. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. October 29, 2025 Naresh BAIL No. 16895 of 2025 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad