Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18925 (AP)

Anaparthi Ramesh v. Superintendent of Police,

WP/11811/2019 · 2025-09-18

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010262392019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11811/2019 Between: 1. ANAPARTHI RAMESH, S/O. CHINA NAGAYYA, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC COOLI, R/O. 10-23(9), INDIRA COLONY, KOPPOLU ROAD, RAILPET, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE. 2. DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOOPOLU ROAD, ONGOLE. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUG POLICE STATION, SUJATHA NAGAR, ONGOLE. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS. SECRETARY, REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. MALPALA PURNACHANDRA REDDY, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O NAGESWAR RAO, R/O D.NO.42-105-242, PULIVENKAT REDDY COLONY, KOTHAPATNAM ROAD, ONGOLE-523 001. 7. PULI PULLA REDDY, S/O OBUL REDDY, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O D.NO.42-104-402, JASHWA COLONY, KOTHAPATNAM ROAD, ONGOLE-523001. 2 8. PINNAMNENI SHANKAR REDDY SATHI REDDY, S/O VENKAT REDDY, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O D.NO.42-104-405, JASHWA COLONY, KOTHAPATNAM ROAD, ONGOLE-523 001. 9. BATHULA MARIAMMA, W/O NAGRAJU, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O D.NO.42-106-639, KOTHAPATNAM ROAD, 1ST LINE, ONGOLE-523001. 10. JILKALA PUNNAIAH, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O D.NO.42-105-298, JAIPRAKASH COLONY, NEAR RAILWAY OVERBRIDGE, NEAR RAILWAY TEACHERS COLONY, KOTHAPATNAM ROAD, ONGOLE-523001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. AMIRAPU UMAMAHESWARA RAO The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.11811 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 3 in taking necessary and proper steps in the light of complaint dated 9.7.2019 and in protecting our lives and property bearing Plot No.39, S.No.354/1C comprises of 2 1/2 cents of Koppolu Village of Ongole Mandal as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to act on the complaint dated 9.7.2019 submitted against the respondents 6 to 10 and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Smt.A.V.S.Laxmi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner is in attendance. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the report of the petitioner, police registered a case in Crime No.440 of 2019 of Ongole Taluk Police Station, Prakasam District, for the offence under Sections 452, 354, 323 r/w 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s)(w)(i)2(va) of Sc/St (POA) Act, and investigated into the case and charge sheet was also filed and the same was numbered as S.C.No.80 of 2020 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge’s Court, Ongole. 4. Recording the submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 19.09.2025 Pmk 5 12 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:11811 OF 2019 Date: 19.09.2025 Pmk