SAHADA BEGUM CHOUDHURY v. NAZRINA SULTANA CHOUDHURY AND 4 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/4004/2024 · 2025-01-05
Kaushik Goswami
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18924 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18924 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010202032024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4004/2024 SAHADA BEGUM CHOUDHURY SUPERVISOR, OFFICE OF THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SOUTH KARIMGANJ ICDS PROJECT, VILLAGE KALIGANJ, PO SHYAMNAGAR, DIST KARIMGANJ, ASSAM VERSUS 1.NAZRINA SULTANA CHOUDHURY AND 4 ORS D/O MD. ABDUL HAMID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MD. ABDUL HAMID, VILLAGE SHARIFNAGAR, PO KARNAMUDHU, DIST KARIMGANJ, ASSAM 788712 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 3:THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE UZANBAZAAR GUWAHATI 781007 4:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER KARIMGANJ ASSAM 788710 5:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER SOUTH KARIMGANJ ICDS PROJECT VILLAGE KALIGANJ PO SHYAM NAGAR DIST KARIMGANJ ASSAM 78872 For the Applicant(s) : Ms. S. Dev, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Chakraborty, Advocate for respondent No.1. : Mr. N. Das, Government Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to
5.
Page No.# 2/2 – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
06.01.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)
The matter comes upon for consideration of this Interlocutory Application, preferred on behalf of the applicant, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with a prayer to condone the delay of 20 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal. Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned counsel puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. N. Das, learned Government Advocate, Assam puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have submitted that they have no objection if the delay of 20 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 20 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal. Hence, this Interlocutory Application is allowed and the delay of 20 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same for admission after 2(two) weeks.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant