HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 7781 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. List of fresh cases has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition though Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 are present. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that since the present petition has been filed against the private person namely Tata Motors Finance Ltd., the present petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on this ground alone. 4. Since no one is present on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed in default. October 15, 2025 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amardeo Singh, Ankit Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Amir Malik .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad