Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18921 (HP)

MOHAN LAL v. THE HRTC AND OTHERS

CWP/11622/2025 · 2025-07-30

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11622/2025 and connected matters Decided on: 30.07.2025 1. CWP No. 11622 of 2025 Mohan Lal …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Ors .…Respondents .……………………………………………………………………………. 2. CWP No. 11624 of 2025 Narinder Kumar …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Ors .…Respondents .……………………………………………………………………………. 3. CWP No. 11626 of 2025 Rukmani Devi …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Ors .…Respondents .……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Mr. Rahul Gathania, and Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishat, Advocates, for the respondents in the respective petitions. . Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Mr. Rahul Gathania and Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Dheeraj K. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Vashishta, learned counsel, accept service of notice on behalf of the respondents in the respective writ petitions. 2. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners, who had retired from the service of the respondents–Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC), with the prayer that the respondents may be directed to release the amount of pension, commuted value of pension, gratuity and leave encashment alongwith interest for the delay on part of the respondents. 3. Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated 25.08.2021, passed in CWP No. 4377 of 2021, titled Sh. Subhash Chand versus The Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla and others alongwith connected matters, in which, the respondents were directed to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioners within a period of six months. In case, the required retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioners within the aforesaid period of six months, then in addition to the due statutory benefits, the petitioners shall also be paid interest at the rate of 9% per annum beyond the period of six months till the date of actual payment. 4. In another subsequent order of this Court passed in CWP No. 6034 of 2021, titled Ram Lal versus The Himachal 3 Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and another and the connected matter, decided on 23.11.2021, the respondents were directed to make payment of gratuity to the petitioners within a period of six months from the date of passing the order. In the event of non-payment of due amount, the petitioners were held entitled to differential amount of interest between the amount of interest statutorily payable to the petitioners as per the Payment of Gratuity Act and the interest at the rate of 9% per annum for the period of delay beyond six months. 5. While disposing of Review Petition No.110 of 2021 on 25.11.2021, preferred against the order dated 09.11.2021 passed in CWP No.6928 of 2021, in which, the aforesaid order dated 25.08.2021 passed in CWP No.4377 of 2021 was relied upon, this Court has clarified the aforesaid order in the terms that the respondent-Corporation shall be liable to pay entire retiral dues of the petitioner, including amount of Gratuity and Leave Encashment and interest amount of Commute Pension alongwith prescribed rate of interest, within a period of six months from the due date till the actual payment is made. 6. In view of above, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release to the petitioners the amount of pension, commuted value of pension, gratuity and leave encashment with actual rate of interest as per applicable rules, till 4 the time of actual payment, which shall be paid to them within a period of six months from today. The due amount of payment, if delayed beyond six months, shall be paid with interest at the rate of 9% per annum till the date of its actual payment. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge July 30, 2025 (R. atal)