Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18920 (AP)

S. Ramakrishna v. High Court of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13847/2024 · 2025-07-20

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

u >4 M APHC010262142024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF Jl TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13847 OF 2024 Between: S. Ramakrishna, S/o Late Pedda Mallappa, Aged 47 years, Occ: Junior Civil Judge (Under Suspension) R/o HNo: 14-153/3, Current Colony. Bypass Road, B. Kothakota Village and Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar Judicial High Court Buildings, Nelapadu, Guntur. 2. High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar Vigilance High Court Buildings, Nelapadu, Guntur. 3. Court of Principal District Judge, Chittoor District. 4. Court of 1st AddI District and Sessions Judge cum Spl Court for Trial U/s POA Act, Chittoor District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF Certiorari to call for the entire records in private compliant CFR No 2509 of 2021 filed by the petitioner and suo moto revocation order dated 18.08.2023 passed in the said file, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without application of min, violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No 3 to issue certified copy of the complaint in private compliant CFR No. 2509 of 2021 filed by the petitioner and suo moto revocation order dated 18.08.2023 passed in the said file. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent No; 3 to issue certified copy of the complaint in private compliant CFR No: 2509 of 2021 filed by the petitioner and suo moto revocation order dated 18.08.2023 passed in the said file. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BALAIAH B Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y N VIVEKANANDA The Court made the following order: ,APHC010262142024 Bench Sr.No:-85 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13847 of 2024 S. Ramakrishna ...Petitioner Vs. High Court of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Balaiah B Advocate for Respondents Mr. Y N Vivekananda CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 21 ** July, 2025 DATE PC: Copy of the order which the petitioner was seeking has since been furnished to the petitioner. ,) -'r ^ The explanation which is sought from the Presiding Officer of respondent No.4 shall be considered on the administrative side. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGjSfRAR //TRUE COPY// SECtrOhr OFFICER To, One CC to Sri. Balaiah B Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Y N Vivekananda Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. gsc HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 13847 OF 2024 Cj E % OV I J»jw m S.I Current Section CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS