Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189184 (ALL)

TULA RAM v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/15465/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15465 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Shiv Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the father of the was working on the post of G.N. 635 13 K Pioneer, 1638, in Pioneer Company (Gref) C/o 56 A.P.O. However, he expired in the year 2019. The grievance of the petitioner is that the writ petitioner has not been paid the gratuity along with the interest thereon despite the fact that the petitioner possesses the succession certificate in his favour. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction for payment of gratuity. 4. Sri S.K. Pal, learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand submits that the claim of the petitioner is to be decided by the Director General, Board Road, Delhi, Respondent no.2. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months, after considering the competing claims, if any. October 15, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Shiv Kumar Pal (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Tula Ram .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad