HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9061 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. List of fresh cases has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition though Sri Arpit Agarwal, learned counsel on behalf of respondent no.2 is present. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent no.2 that since in the writ petition relief is sought against private Company namely C.S.L. Finance Ltd., the present petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on this ground alone. 4. Since no one is present on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed in default. October 15, 2025 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suneel Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arpit Agarwal, C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Pankaj Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad