Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189166 (MAD)

KINETIC KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT, v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

WP/39287/2025 · 2025-11-21

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No. 39287 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.11.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No. 39287 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.44094 of 2025 Kinetic Kanchipuram District Small and Tiny Industries Association, Rep. by its General Secretary, V.Shankar, Plot No.80, Thirumudivakkam Main Road, Thirumudivakkam, Chennai-600 132. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District. 2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC), Chennai -600 002. 3.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC), Tiruvallur. Respondents ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 39287 of 2025 PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from opening the liquor shop (TASMAC Shop) in Survey No.532, at Thirumudivakkam, Krishna Nagar Ph-II, Kancheepuram District by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 08.09.2025. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Selvam For Respondents: Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.K.Balakrishnan Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This public interest litigation has been filed praying for a relief to restrain the respondents from opening Tasmac Shop in Survey No.532 at Thirumudivakkam, Krishna Nagar Phase-II, Kancheepuram District. 3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 39287 of 2025 and 3 would submit that, even before filing of this petition, the District Collector had passed an order granting permission on 02.09.2025. He further submits that a representation has also been submitted by the petitioner not to open any liquor shop. 4. Since an order has been passed on 02.09.2025, prior to the filing of this petition, the present writ petition is not maintainable without challenge to the order dated 02.09.2025. 5. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to challenge the order dated 02.09.2025 passed by the District Collector. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 21.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 39287 of 2025 To: 1.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District. 2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC), Chennai -600 002. 3.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC), Tiruvallur. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 39287 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr W.P.No. 39287 of 2025 21.11.2025 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis