Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(Crl.) No.1030 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.10.2025 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.(Crl.) No.1030 of 2025 Alamelu ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police Kallakuruchi District – 606 213
2. The Sub-Inspector of Police Thirukoilur Police Station Kallakuruchi District
3. Murugan
4. Rajiv Gandhi ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent herein to give police protection for petitioner and her family members based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.09.2025 pending before 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gangadaran For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(Crl.) No.1030 of 2025 O R D E R This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to give police protection to the petitioner and her family members based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.09.2025 and also to take action against the private respondents herein. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the suit filed by the private respondents was decreed in favour of the petitioner, the first appeal was decreed in favor of the private respondents. Against which, the petitioner preferred a second appeal before this Court and the same was also dismissed against the petitioner. Hence, challenging the same, the petitioner has filed a Review Petition before this Court and the same is pending. While so, the private respondents have filed an execution petition and tried to put up a construction in the subject property and when the same was questioned, they abused the petitioner and her husband with filthy language and also attacked with iron road. In this regard, the petitioner has given a complaint to the respondent police. However, no action has been taken. Hence, the present petition is filed. 3. Heard and perused the materials available on record. 4. It is made clear that if at all there is any violation of decree, it is well open to execute the decree in the manner known to law and there is no 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(Crl.) No.1030 of 2025 bar under the law to execute the decree merely because the review petition is pending. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. 10.10.2025 ksa-2 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No To
1.
The Superintendent of Police Kallakuruchi District – 606 213
2. The Sub-Inspector of Police Thirukoilur Police Station Kallakuruchi District
3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(Crl.) No.1030 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR
, J.
ksa-2 W.P.(Crl.) No.1030 of 2025 10.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis